Published: Sunday, 19th October, 2008 8:00am
Bronze age 'treasure' found at gravel site
by Callum Brodie
Comments (2) | 
Print | 
Email
Another significant Bronze Age find has been unearthed at the Kingsmead Quarry in Horton.
Archaeologists believe that the item, known as a Picardy pin, dates back to around the 11th century BC and was originally used as a costume or hair pin.
The 20cm long pin was discovered as a result of an archaeological dig conducted by leading building materials provider, CEMAX UK, prior to mineral extraction of sand and gravel on the site.
Previous finds on the site have included arrowheads, flint tools, broken pottery and a bronze and leather working tool.
Andrew Fitzpatrick of Wessex Archaeology, explained: "These finds are key to enhancing our knowledge and understanding of the history around the rivers Colne and Thames, to the benefit of local communities and historians.
"They also reflect the scale of general changes in society over the centuries, and illustrate how quarrying can make a positive contribution to society beyond the provision of building materials."
Evidence of a field system and the burnt remains of crops found during the course of digging have led to claims that the Bronze Age inhabitants of the area were farmers.
The most important find at the Kingsmead Quarry to date was the discovery in July of an extremely rare example of the site of a Neolithic house.
Experts estimated the remains to be more than 5,000 years old and declared that the site was one of the best examples ever found in the UK.
Further investigations at Kingsmead have now shown that people have inhabited the site for the past 14,000, a period dating back to the last Ice Age.
It is thought that the river Thames may once have flowed through the area. This may help to explain why people occupied the site for so many years as rivers have traditionally been crucial for early settlement.
Archaeological investigations will continue at Kingsmead for the next ten years as mineral extraction on the site progresses.
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumbleupon
DianaGainer
(Unregistered User)
Oct 22 08 13:39
Our Ref: 985
Use the ref number if you need to report this comment
Your dates have me a bit confused. The remains are more than 5,000 years old, which seems to me to be the same as 3000 BC more or less. But 11th century BC would seem to be 1000 BC. Have I "slipped a cog" or is the pin just a good deal younger than the rest of the site?
Report this comment
A. Watts
(Unregistered User)
Oct 26 08 22:09
Our Ref: 1052
Use the ref number if you need to report this comment
Diana- I believe the 5,000 years refers to the Neolithic house and not the pin!
Report this comment
For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register